I wish Amazon would require people who “review” books to back up negative statements with facts, including examples and/or suggestions.
This past week, I received my first “negative” review about WINDFALL. The reviewer gave the novel two stars out of five. Basically, there were two complaints.
First, the reviewer thought Windfall wasn’t a thriller. My question is, if it’s not a thriller then what is it? There was no opinion offered. The reviewer merely stated the book wasn’t thrilling. This particular comment doesn’t bother me too much because choosing a genre is rather subjective. Many books can be classified in several genres. But, I wish I’d been given an opinion as to what genre the reader thought Windfall should be in.
Secondly, the review stated Windfall had frequent grammatical errors. I had numerous people read the novel before I published it and none of them said a thing about grammar. They had a lot to say about characters or story line but nothing about grammar.
Now, I’m not saying Windfall has no errors. I am, after all, human, and I don’t have a professional editor watching my back. But when a reviewer states a novel has frequent grammatical errors, I truly think they should back up their statement with facts. Did the reviewer find one error or several hundred errors. By using the word frequent the reviewer states the writer constantly made mistakes. And, in this case, I think the reviewer is wrong.
Liking or disliking a book can be a very subjective thing.
But, when a reviewer is negative about something specific, it would be helpful if they backed up their comment with facts and/or suggestions.
It’s called CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM.
Charles Dickens


